In California family law, there is an absolute duty to provide full and accurate financial disclosures. The requirement is not a mere procedural formality—it is a foundational requirement enshrined in Family Law Code:
The requirements are so important that we devoted a four-part blog series to address it. Part one was a general overview and the basic requirements for financial disclosures in a divorce proceeding in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Part two was about the files and information you need to comply. Part three was how to serve the documents and forms.
In this article we will cover the ramifications if you either inadvertently or intentionally fail to make the proper financial disclosures.
Disclaimer: This blog constitutes general information and is not legal advice. This platform is not a law firm, and its employees, agents, or representatives are not acting as your attorney. The content and tools offered are intended to assist individuals in understanding and navigating the divorce process without an attorney but are not a substitute for advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. To allow you to independently verify information, wherever a fact appears below, you'll find a link to the statute, court rule, or source behind it.
The Family Law Code imposes serious consequences if you fail to make the proper financial disclosures.
California Family Code § 2107 (Sanctions): Courts can issue financial penalties, attorney fee orders, or other Sanctions for Failure to Disclose Assets in a Divorce if a party refuses to comply with disclosure rules. Courts may also use Failure to Disclose Assets in Divorce Cases to limit evidence or testimony from the non-compliant spouse.
To appreciate how this is applied, let’s look at several circumstances that can arise.
Most omissions aren't intentional deception but honest mistakes. They're a forgotten 401(k) from a job you left a decade before, a home equity line of credit you didn't think of as a separate debt, a value column filled with "unknown," or an expense figure you rounded because you were tired.
Mistakes happen more often than you think and the courts understand that when you are representing yourself, you may not have the knowledge and certainly not the experience that a practicing family law attorney has.
For omissions at this end of the spectrum, the consequences are more procedural and expensive but not catastrophic. These types of errors often come to light because the other spouse recognizes there has been an error. Family Code § 2107(a) lets the complying spouse ask the other, in writing and within a reasonable time, to prepare the missing declaration or provide more particularity. If the offending spouse complies, that usually is the end of the matter.
However, if that request goes nowhere, under Family Code § 2107(b) the complying party may do one or more of the following:
(1) File a motion to compel a further response.
(2) File a motion for an order preventing the noncomplying party from presenting evidence on issues that should have been covered in the declaration of disclosure.
(3) File a motion showing good cause for the court to grant the complying party's voluntary waiver of receipt of the noncomplying party's preliminary declaration of disclosure pursuant to California Family Code § 2104 (Preliminary Disclosure): or California Family Code § 2105 (Final Disclosure).
The second option has real teeth. A judge can bar you from putting on evidence about an asset you failed to disclose. If you didn't list the business, you may not get to argue about what the business is worth.
Where the non-complying party has failed to voluntarily correct an omission, the court can award sanctions. California Family Code § 2107 (c) says that if a party fails to comply with any provision of the disclosure chapter, "the court shall, in addition to any other remedy provided by law, impose money sanctions against the noncomplying party." The sanctions must be "in an amount sufficient to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct, and shall include reasonable attorney's fees, costs incurred, or both," unless the court finds the noncomplying party acted with substantial justification or that sanctions would be unjust.
"Shall" is the operative word. Sanctions under this section aren't discretionary in the way most sanctions are. The escape hatches are substantial justification and injustice, and neither one covers not bothering.
The ramifications may include attorney fees if the complying party is represented by counsel. California Family Code § 271 authorizes the award of attorney fees as a sanction based on conduct that frustrates settlement and cooperation. Section 271 requires that the non-complying receive notice and an opportunity to be heard. Any award is payable from the sanctioned party's property or income, including their share of the community property.
When a party intentionally tries to hide or deceive, the consequences get very serious.
California Family Code § 1101 (g) provides that remedies for breach of the fiduciary duty include an award to the other spouse of 50 percent of any asset undisclosed or transferred in breach of that duty, plus attorney's fees and court costs. California Family Code § 1101 (h) raises that to 100 percent when the breach meets the standard in Civil Code § 3294, which covers fraud, oppression, and malice. The asset is valued at the highest of its value on the date of the breach, the date of disposition, or the date of the award.
The real ramifications can be you lose the asset, pay attorney fees, and have significant financial sanctions imposed by the court.
California has a case on this that gets cited constantly, and it's worth knowing because the facts are simple.
Denise Rossi learned in late December 1996 that she'd won $1,336,000 in the lottery, payable over 20 annual installments. She filed for dissolution days later, before the first check arrived. She asked lottery officials how to keep her husband from reaching the prize and had all lottery correspondence sent to her mother's address. She never listed the winnings on her schedule of assets, her final declaration of disclosure, or her income and expense declaration, and she signed a marital settlement agreement warranting that all property had been disclosed. When it came out, the trial court found fraud, oppression, and malice, and awarded Thomas Rossi 100 percent of the winnings under section 1101(h). The Court of Appeal affirmed (*In re Marriage of Rossi* (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 34).
An omission turned a $668,000 potential problem into a $1,336,000 problem.
If a judgment is already entered, two paths matter.
California Family Code § 2107 (d) provides that if a court enters judgment when the parties have failed to comply with all disclosure requirements of the chapter, "the court shall set aside the judgment," and adds that the failure to comply "does not constitute harmless error." There's a carve-out where the court previously granted a voluntary waiver of the other side's preliminary declaration, in which case the judgment is set aside only at the complying party's request, unless the motion rests on actual fraud or on perjury in a disclosure, a waiver of the final declaration, or a current income and expense statement.
California Family Code § 2122 is the general set-aside statute, and it lists exclusive grounds each with their own timetables for initiating action.
It is important to note that in some circumstances the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the discovery of the noncompliance, fraud, or perjury. A hidden asset doesn't become safe because five years passed. But once you know, the year starts, and waiting is how good claims die.
By the time a couple is seeking a divorce most of their goodwill and trust has evaporated. It is not unusual for there to be suspicion that the other party is hiding information about assets. Here are some steps you can take to learn if your suspicions have merit.
The disclosure laws exist because the Legislature concluded that marital property gets divided fairly only when both people can see the whole picture. The statutes expect compliance and the courts are prepared to impose heavy penalties and sanctions on those who decide not to comply with the disclosure requirements.
And again: this article is general information about California law and Los Angeles County procedure, not legal advice for your situation.
We understand that the divorce process with its unique rules and jargon can be confusing. DivvyLaw wants to be a conduit to allow you to better understand and navigate family law issues in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. If you would like to be notified of upcoming blogs and be put on a wait list for access to a revolutionary solution, click on the button below and you will be added to our list.